Comments on: Qsync: Bigger than Dropbox!

By: Tomasz Rak

Tomasz Rak — Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:44:59 +0000

Could you explain what do you mean by “the name conflicts between Qsync server (NAS) and clients after it is back online from its disconnection” (in Conflict Policies)? What is this “name conflict” ?

By: Rich

Rich — Sun, 19 Jun 2016 15:39:21 +0000

Dropbox is a bit crap, but it runs everywhere, QSync is much, much smaller as it only runs on a tiny portion of connected computers.
Add to this it’s dangerous, bug ridden, overwriting, file losing disastrous functionality and it’s best avaoided. (See the forums for details and don’t trust ANYTHING to QSync that you haven’t backed up elsewhere!)

By: Dave

Dave — Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:51:16 +0000

Pity it is so slow. I backup up 70Gb to Google drive and the same to Drop Box in a few hours. WSYNC took 2 days over a ethernet cable 1gb LAN connection. TS212

By: Erik

Erik — Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:14:58 +0000

A Qnap Qsync client would be great. Seen as that QNAP is based on linux, and an apple version already exists, it should not be too hard, should it??

By: g4b00g4b0

g4b00g4b0 — Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:11:57 +0000

+1 waiting for linux client!

By: jeff

jeff — Sat, 27 Dec 2014 18:14:57 +0000

desperately want/need linux support!

By: Andrey

Andrey — Mon, 25 Aug 2014 08:11:08 +0000

And we wont slideshow for jpg files (same as dropbox)

By: burado51

burado51 — Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:01:12 +0000

I guess they may add this feature in this year, but not sure..

By: Giuliano

Giuliano — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 07:22:39 +0000

But we wont to share the files even out the Sync Folder. Please do that!!!